Stanford prison experiment review

June 9, 0 Kyle Patrick Alvarez continues to excel and evolve as a filmmaker. It would be negligent to suggest that the film, winner of both the Alfred P. Nowhere in the mess of human psyches splayed open onscreen is there the familiar stench of ulterior motives as is so commonly found surrounding projects of similar ilk. Not exactly angels in pinstripes, and far from the folk hero Bucky Phillips represented in his fugitive journey across Niagara county a decade earlier, these men, whose pictures lay plastered all over the front page in Western New York today, and most likely well on their way into Canada as we speak, are as much products of the Prison system itself as they are the types of minds we seek safety from, through incarceration.

Stanford prison experiment review

Chillingly bad science ivko 29 May This film is a dramatization of a real psychological experiment that took place at the Stanford University in The motivation was to study the dynamics of individuals who were arbitrarily placed into roles as prisoners and guards at a simulated prison.

Since none of the study participants were actual criminals or correction officers, the idea was to glean insight into the psychology of the power imbalance that arises from the situation, as opposed to the people involved.

Things famously degraded quickly and the experiment was terminated after only six days. Multiple guards displayed sadistic traits and performed acts of psychological and even to a smaller degree physical torture, all overseen, permitted, and arguably encouraged by "superintendent" Philip Zimbardo, the study's creator.

The conditions the participants were exposed to were reprehensible, but even worse is that ultimately this was simply bad science, making the whole endeavor a cruel waste of time. The experiment lacked much of the basic rigor required, as highlighted in the film by a verbatim repetition of an actual conversation Mr.

Zimbardo had with a colleague who questioned some of the basic scientific methodologies being utilized in the study. Zimbardo himself committed what I would consider borderline criminal acts such as initially denying "prisoner" participants the option to leave when requested to instill in them the belief that their situation was, in fact, realwhich came frighteningly close to converting the "study" into a criminal act of kidnapping in my opinion.

Zimbardo explains this as him getting "to close" to the experiment, but personally I'm not particularly sympathetic to that argument.

When you watch the actual clips from the study and read the notes, I'm more inclined to think that Mr.

Stanford prison experiment review

Zambardo himself had a sadistic streak that he failed to control for a time. Honestly, I think the man should have faced criminal charges for his role in this fiasco.

In the end, some good did come out of this experiment in that it created a push for establishing standards and controls for psychological experiments in the future.

Prisoner, or Guard? Which would you be?

Despite knowing the actual outcome, I still felt anxious about the fates of the young men involved, a testament to the power of the acting and directing here. To me, this movie is a chilling and visceral reminder of how easy it is to create conditions that foster cruelty and dehumanization.

A rewarding, if somewhat depressing, film to watch. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.

Fact-based thriller The Stanford Prison Experiment unshackles trailer | Film | The Guardian

CleveMan66 1 August "Would you rather be a prison guard or a prisoner? The movie is based on a real-life psychology department study conducted at California's Stanford University in August In spite of the above question being asked of all applicants, participants were assigned as either guards or prisoners by coin flips.

Faculty offices in the basement of the university's psychology building were transformed into a mock prison wing.

Philip Zimbardo, the psychology professor who led a team of graduate students and advisors in conducting the experiment, wanted to test the theory that conflicts between guards and inmates are caused by the men's individual personality traits. A documentary about the experiment was released in and a German film loosely based on the experiment came out infollowed by an American remake inbut this is the first feature film which attempts to dramatize the actual events that took place.

As we see Zimbardo Billy Crudup going through his selection process, we meet his team James Wolk, Keir Gilchrist and Gaius Charles and the student participants including "prisoners" Ezra Miller, Tye Sheridan and Thomas Mann, along with Michael Angarano as a "guard" who based his authoritative persona on a sadistic captain in the movie "Cool Hand Luke".

The guards are briefed and given generic uniforms. The prisoners are "arrested" by actual local police officers and sent to the "prison" to "await trial".

There and Back Again

The guards process the prisoners, give them uniforms crude smocks and stocking caps and taught to only identify themselves by their prisoner number and to address all guards as "Mr.

The guards initially perform their duties tentatively while there's a lot of eye-rolling by the prisoners. Both the guards and the prisoners quickly adapt to their roles to a surprising degree and even internalize them.

The guards become increasingly menacing and sadistic. The prisoners' actions vary, but all are in character as some comply while others resist the guards' authority and talk of escape and some are even pushed to their psychological limits.

Zimbardo and his team watch and listen to all the goings-on via closed-circuit camera and hidden microphones.A REVIEW AND DISCUSSION OF THE STANFORD PRISON EXPERIMENT 2 A Review and Discussion of the Stanford Prison Experiment 1.

Both sets of guidelines and regulations, N.I.H and A.S.A, identify the need to respect and consider the rights, dignity and diversity of the participants.

Stanford prison experiment review

The foundation of both policies is the “Hippocratic Maxim”, also called “Do No Harm”. Find helpful customer reviews and review ratings for The Stanford Prison Experiment at timberdesignmag.com Read honest and unbiased product reviews from our users.

Stanford Prison Experiment () Review | Speak Now Storyteller

🔴Beautiful Piano Music LIVE 24/7: Instrumental Music for Relaxation, Study, Stress Relief Meditation Relax Music watching Live now. “The Stanford Prison Experiment” is the kind of movie that raises as many questions as it answers.

It’s also the kind of film where you want to budget some time for discussion afterward. You won’t be able to shake this one off easily. In August of , Dr. Philip Zimbardo conducted an experiment at Stanford University, in which 24 male students took on the role of either prison guard or prisoner in a simulated “prison.

The Stanford Prison Experiment is in Cinemas 10 th June, on digital 13 th June and DVD and Blu-Ray 27 th June Previous article Jar Jar’s Legacy: Ted, Gollum and the Best Fully Animated Characters.

The Stanford Prison Experiment Movie Review | The Mad Movie Man